Home » Uncategorized » Canon EOS 600D vs Nikon D5100 canon Rebel T3i

Canon EOS 600D vs Nikon D5100 canon Rebel T3i

The two cameras  (canon EOS 600D and Nikon D5100)closely match each other in
both size and weight, although they differ in terms of their finish and design. I found the slightly mottled treatment of the D5100’s body more pleasing in the hand than the less refined casing of the 600D, although both cameras make good use of rubber around the grip for both security and comfort. Canon has been a touch more generous here, though, and has provided more rubber for the thumb to rest. Each is built well, understandably with less solidity than more professional magnesium-alloy bodied DSLRs, but with no creaking when subjected to pressure of any sort. To the eye there doesn’t appear to be much to separate the cameras’ grips, although upon handling them the 600D’s feels more substantial. I found it to be the easier to handle and more enjoyable to operate, and it felt more secure in my hands with a range of different lenses. The design of the D5100’s grip meant that it felt slightly less at home in my averagely sized hands, although anyone interested in such The Nikon LCD Screen a model is advised to

ONE AREAWHERE THE TWO CAMERAS DO GO ABOUT THINGS DIFFERENTLY IS IN THEWAY THE CONTROLS ARE ACCESSED AND SETTINGS ALTERED.

Handle it for themselves, as their preferences may be different. One area where the two cameras do go about things differently is in the way the controls are accessed and settings altered. While the 600D’s setup allows options to be accessed either through direct buttons or the main shooting display, the D5100 allows only for the latter. This has allowed Nikon to simplify the design of the rear, and with fewer buttons it appears as a less intimidating model for novices. However, the placement of some of the buttons it does have is questionable. For example, the ‘i’ button for changing many settings is used almost exclusively in conjunction with the menu pad, yet the two are spaced unnecessarily far apart, whereas on the 600D the Q button used to bring up the equivalent option is right next to the menu pad with which it is used. Overall, I found Canon’s system more intuitively designed.

PERFORMANCE

The performance metter a lot when we talk about something.Almost every DSLR or tripod have good performance but if you going to buy best tripods under 100 dollar then you need to check first.Although both viewfinders are perfectly capable for their task, when shooting outdoors I found the D5100’s finder to be more pleasing to use, given its slightly brighter view and more colourful representation of the scene. The 600D’s viewfinder isn’t too far behind, and admittedly this difference is only noticeable during a direct comparison, but it’s just a shade cloudier in its appearance. While the two cameras have similar burst speeds on paper, shooting continuously threw up some unexpected results. While the 600D slowed down its 3.7fps pace after only around three to four simultaneous RAW and JPEG frames, the D5100 maintained its speed for an average of 10 frames at a time. Both cameras allowed me to take further images while any prior bursts were being processed, although the D5100 shot more than the one frame at a time the canon 600D tended to allow, despite it being burdened by having around twice the images to process. Although it became easy to spot the characteristics of each camera while analysing its images, occasionally each would veer off to produce a different result from the one expected, something which may be attributed to the scene- and content-dependent nature of technology used for metering and processing. Typically, the canon 600D’s white balance was warmer than the nikon D5100’s; this benefited some situations, but images with foliage were better with the colder and slightly more neutral results from the D5100.

IMAGES WITH FOLIAGE WERE BETTER WITH THE COLDER AND SLIGHTLY MORE NEUTRAL RESULTS FROMTHE D5100, WHERE GREENS WERE RENDERED WITH GREATER VIBRANCY.

Where greens were rendered with greater vibrancy. Each camera’s metering system did well to ensure the main subject was properly exposed, although with a slight tendency to overexpose the same subject, the canon 600D’s results showed highlights details to be lost a little prematurely; this can be remedied with Canon’s Highlight Tone Priority option, which works effectively. Again, in certain situations a slightly brighter subject may be preferable, although in terms of reliability and balance the nikon D5100 had the edge. The advantage of Canon’s bigger 18MP sensor is slight and I didn’t find it translated into any major gains in detail. I noticed less of a difference between the RAW and JPEG output of the D5100 than between the canon 600D’s files, although with slightly sharper images to begin with there’s less work to be done with Nikon’s files.

For More reviews visit tripodsdslr because they give complete details about it.

The kit lenses of the two cameras performed about as well as each other and both proved the effectiveness of their respective image stabilisation systems. Elsewhere there were differences: chromatic aberrations were evident in both cameras’ RAW files, although in-camera processing resulted in the D5100’s JPEGs showing far less than the 600D’s. Conversely, RAW files from the two cameras showed Canon’s kit lens to have the better handle over distortions, although each camera offers an optional correction setting.

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*
*